I’ve used both too, and while @himmelsjager’s assessment is spot-on, I do think there’s a bit more to consider.
With Airmagnet: if you have a knack for deep diving into network diagnostics and aren’t scared off by potentially spending more time learning the software, it can be an invaluable tool, especially for larger enterprises. But, that steep pricing and complex interface might not be everyone’s cup of tea.
However, Ekahau impresses with its simplicity and robust visual tools. It’s almost like the Apple of WiFi analysis tools: intuitive and visually pleasing. Yes, it might not have as extensive RF analysis as Airmagnet, but for most office environments, Ekahau covers enough ground to provide an excellent survey.
One thing to consider: since WiFi environments constantly change with new devices and interference sources, the faster learning curve of Ekahau can be a big plus. Imagine needing to train someone else in your team; Ekahau would likely be far less of a headache.
I also see @himmelsjager mentioned Netspot. Let’s be real: budget constraints are a reality, and Netspot offers a surprisingly solid alternative. It’s user-friendly, cost-effective, and can deliver the essential insights you need for small to medium-sized offices without breaking the bank. Definitely worth checking out if you don’t need all the bells and whistles of Airmagnet or Ekahau.
In conclusion, your choice boils down to the scale of your deployment and your specific needs. For enterprise-level, deep dives, Airmagnet; for user-friendly and visually-driven surveys, Ekahau; and for budget-friendly solid functionalities, Netspot.
Enhance your WiFi site survey efforts by choosing the right tool. Whether you lean towards Airmagnet for comprehensive analysis, Ekahau for intuitive use, or opt for the cost-effective Netspot, you’ll be well-equipped to optimize your office’s WiFi.